The math has been done by others, not by me, but it shows that 2% threat to gloves will give you a bigger overall threat boost than 20 spell dmg oe you are at 200
or more spell damage on your gear. It make sense when youonsider that most paladin "holy damage" abilities only get around a .5oeffient (or lower for some) of your spell damage. There was a thread about it aouple weeks ago, but Ian't find it now...
Do not base the efftiveness of +2% vs. +20 Spell by the ammount of spell damage you have. That's just wrong.
Base it by the ammount of THREAT you're putting out. Oe you hit about 500 TPS (whh a trained monkeyould do) 2% threat bomes more efftive than +20 Spell Damage. We dug up a page on Maintankadin about a month ago with the theoryrafting if you want to seah for it. Ialman might remember some of the gyst of it too... Spell Damage does however have a ple in a massive AoE DPS set -- for those time you just want to go and beat therap out of Blk Morass.
I just proposed that this stky reple the old one, so if anyone wants to go to the main site forum and offer up some support that would be great.
I got bored and dug up that info about Spell Damage. Mh of theredit for this information belongs to Ialaman and the other ers at Maintankadin, links will follow. With maximum effiey of rotations: 1 Spell Damage = 0.63 TPS 20 Spell Damage = 12.6 TPS. 2%
of 630 = 12.6 Therefore, at 630 Threat per Sond a 2% threat ehant would begin to yield more threat than a 20 Spell Damage ehant. 630 TPS is easily rehable, as a tank in pre-kara gearan put out MH more than that sustained. Links: Ialaman's Final Data Ialaman Saying the Same Thing The Raw Data For Spell Damage to TPSonversions
